Friday, November 13, 2009

On simplicity

A reader forwarded on the following comment, posted in response to a column about death on the NY Times Happy Days blog:

"I thought I was going to die in an earthquake and it was terrifying especially since I had my child with me and contemplated how to ease his death as I faced my own. But as I age and see the end rushing at me, I am training myself to accept it. Sort of. Maybe I am hoping that by the time it comes, I am more at peace with it than the younger me.

I don’t think of meaning and happiness. Life has no meaning and searching for it is silly. We should spend our time reducing suffering of others we share this planet with, both people and animals. If we can, we should make the world less harsh, and encourage exploration and science because we are a curious people. Happiness comes and goes and we know what makes us happy and if we can, we should do those things. There is no value in misery.

Death does not give me meaning. That makes no sense to me. This frantic search for meaning leaves me cold. The reframing of religion as spiritual, does likewise. There is no god, there is no meaning. And yet, I reach out to people all the time to try and help reduce their pain. I am compelled to do so. People tell me my life is meaningful. No, my acts have meaning for those I help, and while that is good, it does not mean I have a meaningful life. I am alive and that is what is important. And then I will be dead. And that will be that. Nothing is “allotted” to us. That assumes an “allotor” which isn’t the case. It’s hard to accept at first that this is all there is, and the only meaning is what you make, but once you do, it’s liberating. I’ve really enjoyed this journey. It’s been great to be here and I hope the end is peaceful and wanted when it comes, but don’t we all."

There is much to like in this brief piece, specifically the ease with which the writer conveys the fundamental simplicity of the absurd. Searching for meaning? Silly. But helping others? Good. Not because it has "meaning," but simply because it is the human thing to do.

At its core, the absurd (at least to us) is simply a method for living a peaceful, contented life. The fact that it is also a very consistent belief system is nice, but more of a side benefit. A few months back we read a piece in the Atlantic titled "What Makes Us Happy." It was about a group of people researchers tracked from college through the rest of their lives, with the goal of figuring out what made some people happier than others. The author seemed a bit nonplussed at the results, as if there were no consistent thread, but to us it was simple. As an individual described as "the study's exemplar" put it: "I have an overriding sense (or philosophy) that it’s all a big nothing—or ‘chasing after wind’ as it says in Ecclesiastes and therefore, at least up to the present, nothing has caused me too much grief.”

Live simply, be content with what you have, and be nice to others. And...have a nice weekend!

4 comments:

  1. I agree, a wonderfully thoughtful comment. It describes the absurd with much grace. The comment, and the absurd, are logically correct, consistent, simple, and liberating.

    I've read the Happy Days blog on NYT and generally find it a waste of time (but internet surfing fills my time at work, so I read just about anything).

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'd like to point out two peculiarities of humanity in the above thoughtful comment:

    1. Happiness comes and goes and we know what makes us happy and if we can, we should do those things.

    2. I reach out to people all the time to try and help reduce their pain.

    This is in relation to Richard's discovery of Actual Freedom:

    1. Impermanent affective pleasure -> Permanent sensuous pleasure (PCE)

    2. Feeling-care -> actual-care.

    From my understanding,

    1. The belief that one cannot change human nature (and thus be happy only when you do certain things) really needs to be questioned. If this belief is true, I cannot be *more* content than yesterday at simply sitting in the armchair.

    2. Compassion - assuming that is what the commentator is referring to - itself is a pain. Feeling comes prior to thoughts. That *feeling* which comes prior to the *act* of compassion needs some attention. Imagine yourself witnessing an agony of a closed one; can one be carefree/happy and yet perform the material actions necessary to alleviate one's suffering?

    ReplyDelete
  3. >1. The belief that one cannot change human nature (and thus be happy only when you do certain things) really needs to be questioned.

    Well, I think we'd all agree that certain basic actions needs be taken to be happy. Eating properly and getting ample amounts of sleep, for example. Ideally, perhaps, after our basic body needs are taken care of, if we were able to experience every moment as if it is new and fresh then we wouldn't feel a need to search for new and exciting things to do in order to avoid boredom.

    ReplyDelete